AUDA-NEPAD Logo

Assessment Methodology

Framework and approach for AfCFTA/AIDA impact assessment

Overview

The AfCFTA/AIDA Impact Assessment Platform employs a comprehensive, multi-dimensional methodology to evaluate the implementation and impact of the African Continental Free Trade Area (AfCFTA) and the Accelerated Industrial Development for Africa (AIDA) initiative. This methodology combines quantitative and qualitative approaches to provide evidence-based insights for policy-making.

Key Objectives

  • Assess the potential and actual impact of AfCFTA on trade, investment, and employment
  • Evaluate the enabling environment for trade facilitation and industrialization
  • Monitor progress in industrial development across priority sectors
  • Identify challenges and opportunities for policy intervention
  • Provide data-driven recommendations for continental integration

Three-Tool Assessment Framework

The platform utilizes three interconnected assessment tools, each designed to capture specific dimensions of the AfCFTA and AIDA implementation:

AfCFTA Potential Impact Assessment

Purpose: Evaluate the anticipated and realized impacts of AfCFTA on businesses, trade flows, and employment at the firm level using advanced economic modeling and simulation.

Key Components:
  • Export Impact Assessment: Analyzes effects on export activities, markets, and competitiveness
  • Import Impact Assessment: Evaluates import patterns, competition, and market access
  • Employment & Social Impact: Assesses job creation, skills development, and social outcomes
  • SMART-WITS Simulation: Economic modeling using SMART (Software for Market Analysis and Restrictions on Trade) methodology
External API Integration:
  • WITS API: World Integrated Trade Solution database for trade statistics
  • UN COMTRADE API: International trade data at product level (HS codes)
  • Real-time Data Sync: Automatic updates of trade flows, tariffs, and market data
Calculations & Modeling:
  • Trade Creation: New trade flows resulting from tariff elimination
  • Trade Diversion: Shifts in trade patterns from non-member to member countries
  • Welfare Effects: Consumer surplus, producer surplus, and government revenue changes
  • Employment Multipliers: Job creation estimates based on export growth
  • Elasticity Models: Price and income elasticity of demand calculations
Data Collection:
  • Firm-level surveys targeting exporters, importers, and manufacturers
  • Product-specific questionnaires with HS code classification
  • Quantitative metrics (trade volumes, employment numbers, revenue data)
  • Qualitative assessments (challenges, opportunities, policy recommendations)
Enabling Environment Monitoring

Purpose: Monitor and evaluate the business environment, trade facilitation infrastructure, and institutional frameworks supporting AfCFTA implementation using official AfCFTA monitoring indicators.

Assessment Areas:
  • Customs Efficiency (C1-C6): Clearance times, procedures, documentation, transparency, automation
  • Trade Facilitation (OP1-OP2): One-Stop Border Posts (OSBPs), Single Window systems, training, harmonization
  • Infrastructure (Trans-01, TID-1, TID-2): Transport connectivity, border post quality, ICT systems
  • Trade Finance (TF1-TF3): Financial inclusion, investment attractiveness, capital movement
  • Regulatory Environment: Policy harmonization, standards, compliance
Data Sources & Integration:
  • AfCFTA Monitoring Tool: Official indicators and performance benchmarks
  • World Bank APIs: Doing Business indicators, Logistics Performance Index
  • Customs Databases: ASYCUDA integration for clearance time data
  • Regional Economic Communities: Data from COMESA, ECOWAS, SADC, etc.
Methodology:
  • Stakeholder surveys (businesses, customs officials, trade associations)
  • Performance indicators with standardized INPUT/NEGOTIATION SCORE methodology (1-5 scale)
  • Comparative analysis across countries and time periods
  • Integration with official trade statistics and customs data
  • Quarterly monitoring and annual comprehensive assessments
AIDA Industrialization Progress Assessment

Purpose: Track progress in industrial development across Africa's priority sectors, assess readiness for accelerated industrialization, and measure stakeholder awareness of AfCFTA provisions and opportunities.

Key Components:
  • AfCFTA Awareness Survey: Measures understanding and knowledge of AfCFTA provisions, rules of origin, tariff schedules, and market access opportunities among businesses and stakeholders
  • Product-Level Impact Assessment: Evaluates AfCFTA implementation effects on specific products and value chains
  • Sector Readiness Analysis: Assesses preparedness of priority sectors for continental trade
  • AIDA Cluster Monitoring: Tracks progress across seven industrialization clusters
AIDA Seven Clusters:
  • 1. Industrial Policy: National strategies, sector priorities, policy coherence
  • 2. Production & Trade Capacities: Manufacturing capabilities, value chains, export readiness
  • 3. Infrastructure & Energy: Industrial infrastructure, energy access, logistics
  • 4. Human Resource Development: Skills, training, technical education
  • 5. Innovation & R&D: Technology adoption, research capacity, innovation systems
  • 6. Financing & Resource Mobilisation: Industrial financing, investment promotion
  • 7. Sustainable Development: Environmental standards, green industrialization
Priority Sectors:
  • Agro-processing and food industries
  • Mining and mineral beneficiation
  • Pharmaceuticals and healthcare products
  • Textiles, garments, and leather goods
Data Integration & Analytics:
  • UNIDO Industrial Statistics: Manufacturing value added, production data
  • AfDB Infrastructure Database: Industrial zones, energy access, connectivity
  • Readiness Scoring Algorithm: Multi-dimensional assessment of industrialization capacity
  • Comparative Benchmarking: Cross-country and regional performance analysis

Scoring & Analysis Methodology

Performance Scoring System

The platform uses a standardized 5-point scoring system to ensure consistency and comparability:

Score Range Category Description
4.5 - 5.0 Excellent Outstanding performance, best practices evident
4.0 - 4.4 Very Good Strong performance with minor areas for improvement
3.5 - 3.9 Good Satisfactory performance, some improvements needed
3.0 - 3.4 Average Moderate performance, significant improvements required
2.0 - 2.9 Below Average Weak performance, major interventions needed
1.0 - 1.9 Poor Critical deficiencies, urgent action required

Data Validation & Quality Assurance

Implementation Approach

Stakeholder Engagement

The methodology emphasizes extensive stakeholder participation:

Data Collection Cycle

  1. Annual Assessments: Comprehensive surveys conducted yearly
  2. Quarterly Updates: Key indicators monitored every quarter
  3. Real-time Monitoring: Continuous data collection through the platform
  4. Ad-hoc Studies: Targeted assessments for specific issues or events

Download Full Methodology Document

Get the complete methodology guide with detailed technical specifications, questionnaires, and analytical frameworks.

Back to Portal